4.6 Article

Lamin misexpression upregulates three distinct ubiquitin ligase systems that degrade ATR kinase in HeLa cells

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 365, 期 1-2, 页码 323-332

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11010-012-1272-4

关键词

Proteasomal degradation; RNF123; FBXW10; HECW2; Laminopathy mutations

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology, India
  2. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research
  3. Department of Biotechnology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lamins are the major structural components of the nucleus and mutations in the human lamin A gene cause a number of genetic diseases collectively termed laminopathies. At the cellular level, lamin A mutations cause aberrant nuclear morphology and defects in nuclear functions such as the response to DNA damage. We have investigated the mechanism of depletion of a key damage sensor, ATR (Ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated-and-Rad3-related) kinase, in HeLa cells expressing lamin A mutants or lamin A shRNA. The degradation of ATR kinase in these cells was through the proteasomal pathway as it was reversed by the proteasomal inhibitor MG132. Expression of lamin A mutants or shRNA led to transcriptional activation of three ubiquitin ligase components, namely, RNF123 (ring finger protein 123), HECW2 (HECT domain ligase W2) and the F-box protein FBXW10. Ectopic expression of RNF123, HECW2 or FBXW10 directly resulted in proteasomal degradation of ATR kinase and the ring domain of RNF123 was required for this degradation. However, these ligases did not alter the stability of DNA-dependent protein kinase, which is not depleted upon lamin misexpression. Although degradation of ATR kinase was reversed by MG132, it was not affected by the nuclear export inhibitor, leptomycin B, suggesting that ATR kinase is degraded within the nucleus. Our findings indicate that lamin misexpression can lead to deleterious effects on the stability of the key DNA damage sensor, ATR kinase by upregulation of specific components of the ubiquitination pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据