4.6 Article

Isolation and characterization of stem-like cells from a human ovarian cancer cell line

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 363, 期 1-2, 页码 257-268

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11010-011-1178-6

关键词

Ovarian cancer; Cancer-initiating cells; CD44; Drug resistance; Pathway enrichment analysis

资金

  1. Ovarian Cancer Institute
  2. Ovarian Cycle Foundation
  3. Robinson Family Foundation
  4. Deborah Nash Harris Endowment Fund
  5. Waterfall Foundation
  6. OBNET Women's Healthcare

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increasing evidence supports the existence of a subpopulation of cancer cells capable of self-renewal and differentiation into diverse cell lineages. These cancer stem-like or cancer-initiating cells (CICs) also demonstrate resistance to chemo- and radiotherapy and may function as a primary source of cancer recurrence. We report here on the isolation and in vitro propagation of multicellular ovarian cancer spheroids from a well-established ovarian cancer cell line (OVCAR-3). The spheroid-derived cells (SDCs) display self-renewal potential, the ability to produce differentiated progeny, and increased expression of genes previously associated with CICs. SDCs also demonstrate higher invasiveness, migration potential, and enhanced resistance to standard anticancer agents relative to parental OVCAR-3 cells. Furthermore, SDCs display up-regulation of genes associated with epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), anticancer drug resistance and/or decreased susceptibility to apoptosis, as well as, down-regulation of genes typically associated with the epithelial cell phenotype and pro-apoptotic genes. Pathway and biological process enrichment analyses indicate significant differences between the SDCs and precursor OVCAR-3 cells in TGF-beta-dependent induction of EMT, regulation of lipid metabolism, NOTCH and Hedgehog signaling. Collectively, our results indicate that these SDCs will be a useful model for the study of ovarian CICs and for the development of novel CIC-targeted therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据