4.6 Article

Subcellular basis of vitamin C protection against doxorubicin-induced changes in rat cardiomyocytes

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 360, 期 1-2, 页码 215-224

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11010-011-1059-z

关键词

Oxidative stress; Cardiomyocyte apoptosis; Mitogen-activated protein kinase; Cell viability

资金

  1. Canadian Circulatory and Respiratory Institute
  2. Manitoba Health Research Council
  3. St. Boniface Hospital and Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the molecular basis of doxorubicin (Dox)-induced cardiomyopathy is crucial to finding cardioprotective strategies. Oxidative stress-mediated pathways are known to contribute to cardiomyocyte apoptosis due to Dox. Improving the antioxidant defenses of cardiomyocytes could be one strategy for cardiac protection. We tested the effects of vitamin C (Vit C), a potent antioxidant, on Dox-induced cardiomyocyte apoptosis. Adult rat cardiomyocytes were incubated for 24 h with Dox (0.01-10 mu M), with and without different concentrations of Vit C (5-100 mu M). Exposure to Dox (10 mu M) resulted in a 98% increase in the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and creatine kinase (CK) release, 70% increase in p53 as well as ASK-1 activation, 40% increase in p38 activation, 30% increase in pro-apoptotic Bax over anti-apoptotic Bcl-xl ratio and caspase activation, and about 20% reduction in cell viability. Vit C (25 mu M) was able to mitigate Dox-induced changes by decreasing ROS and CK release by 50%, reducing p53 activation by 40%. The increase in ASK-1 and p38 was also significantly mitigated, and apoptosis was reduced while cardiomyocytes viability was improved. This study shows that Dox-induced cardiomyocyte death is mediated by a direct membrane effect as well as intracytoplasmic changes promoting the cardiomyocyte apoptosis. These findings suggest a nutritional approach of using Vit C for preventing Dox-induced cardiotoxicity and better management of cancer patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据