4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

On CK2 regulation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia cell viability

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 356, 期 1-2, 页码 51-55

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11010-011-0947-6

关键词

CK2; Chronic lymphocytic leukemia; Signaling therapy; PI3K-PTEN; IgM; OP9 co-culture

资金

  1. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [2021.04571.BD, PIC/IC/83193/2007] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Specific inhibition of signaling elements essential for the viability of B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells offers great promise for the design of more efficient therapies. The protein serine/threonine kinase CK2 is frequently upregulated in cancer, and it is overexpressed and hyperactivated in primary CLL cells from untreated patients. We have shown that inhibition of CK2 induces apoptosis of CLL cells, whereas it does not significantly impact normal lymphocytes, demonstrating the selectivity of the CK2 inhibitors toward leukemia cells. Notably, although co-culture with OP9 stromal cells and BCR stimulation both promote leukemia cell survival in vitro, they do not prevent apoptosis of CLL cells treated with CK2 inhibitors. PI3K signaling pathway was previously shown to be essential for CLL cell viability, an observation we confirmed in all patient samples analyzed. Further, we observed that CK2 blockade decreases PTEN phosphorylation, leading to PTEN activation, and that apoptosis of CLL cells upon CK2 inhibition is mediated by PKC inactivation. This suggests that activation of PI3K/PKC signaling pathway is involved in the pro-survival effects of CK2 in CLL cells. Sensitivity to CK2 inhibition does not correlate with expression of ZAP-70 or CD38, or with IGVH mutation status. However, it positively correlates with the percentage of CLL cells in the peripheral blood, beta 2 microglobulin levels, and Binet clinical stage. CK2 appears to play an important role in the biology of CLL and constitutes a promising target for the development of leukemia-specific therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据