4.7 Article

Large-scale De Novo Prediction of Physical Protein-Protein Association

期刊

MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS
卷 10, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M111.010629

关键词

-

资金

  1. Klaus Tschira Foundation
  2. European Community [PhenOxiGEn FP7-223539, Ponte FP7-247945, SyBoSS FP7-242129]
  3. German BMBF [NGFNp NeuroNet-TP3 01GS08171, DiGtoP 01GS0859]
  4. German BMWi (GeneCloud)
  5. Max Planck Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Information about the physical association of proteins is extensively used for studying cellular processes and disease mechanisms. However, complete experimental mapping of the human interactome will remain prohibitively difficult in the near future. Here we present a map of predicted human protein interactions that distinguishes functional association from physical binding. Our network classifies more than 5 million protein pairs predicting 94,009 new interactions with high confidence. We experimentally tested a subset of these predictions using yeast two-hybrid analysis and affinity purification followed by quantitative mass spectrometry. Thus we identified 462 new protein-protein interactions and confirmed the predictive power of the network. These independent experiments address potential issues of circular reasoning and are a distinctive feature of this work. Analysis of the physical interactome unravels subnetworks mediating between different functional and physical subunits of the cell. Finally, we demonstrate the utility of the network for the analysis of molecular mechanisms of complex diseases by applying it to genome-wide association studies of neurodegenerative diseases. This analysis provides new evidence implying TOMM40 as a factor involved in Alzheimer's disease. The network provides a high-quality resource for the analysis of genomic data sets and genetic association studies in particular. Our interactome is available via the hPRINT web server at: www.print-db.org. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 10: 10.1074/mcp.M111.010629, 1-13, 2011.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据