4.7 Article

A Combined Proteomics and Metabolomics Profiling of Gastric Cardia Cancer Reveals Characteristic Dysregulations in Glucose Metabolism

期刊

MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS
卷 9, 期 12, 页码 2617-2628

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M110.000661

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology [2008ZX10002-017]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2010CB91200]
  3. 863 Program [2007AA02Z4]
  4. 973 Program [2007CB914704]
  5. National Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholars [30725010]
  6. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30930023, 90813023]
  7. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KSCX2-YW-R-152, KSCX-YW-R-73]
  8. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [08140902300]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gastric cardia cancer (GCC), which occurs at the gastric-esophageal boundary, is one of the most malignant tumors. Despite its high mortality and morbidity, the molecular mechanism of initiation and progression of this disease is largely unknown. In this study, using proteomics and metabolomics approaches, we found that the level of several enzymes and their related metabolic intermediates involved in glucose metabolism were deregulated in GCC. Among these enzymes, two subunits controlling pyruvic acid efflux, lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA) and pyruvate dehydrogenase B (PDHB), were further analyzed in vitro. Either down-regulation of LDH subunit LDHA or overexpression of PDH subunit PDHB could force pyruvic acid into the Krebs cycle rather than the glycolysis process in AGS gastric cancer cells, which inhibited cell growth and cell migration. Our results reflect an important glucose metabolic signature, especially the dysregulation of pyruvic acid efflux in the development of GCC. Forced transition from glycolysis to the Krebs cycle had an inhibitory effect on GCC progression, providing potential therapeutic targets for this disease. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 9: 2617-2628, 2010.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据