4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Data Processing Algorithms for Analysis of High Resolution MSMS Spectra of Peptides with Complex Patterns of Posttranslational Modifications

期刊

MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS
卷 9, 期 5, 页码 804-810

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M900431-MCP200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [S10 RR019934, P41RR001614, RR019934, P41 RR001614] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The emergence of efficient fragmentation methods such as electron capture dissociation (ECD) and electron transfer dissociation (ETD) provides the opportunity for detailed structural characterization of heavily covalently modified large peptides and small proteins such as intact histones. Even with effective gas phase ion isolation so that a single molecular precursor ion is selected, the MSMS spectrum of a heavily modified peptide may reveal the presence of a mixture of peptides with the same amino acid sequence and the same total number of posttranslational modification (PTM) moieties (same PTM composition) but with different PTM configurations or site-specific occupancy isoforms. Currently available data analysis methods depend on a deisotoping procedure, which becomes less effective when spectra (fragmentation patterns) contain many overlapping isotopic distributions. Peptide database search engines can only identify the most abundant PTM configuration (PTM arrangement on different residues) in such mixtures. To identify all the PTM configurations present in these mixtures and to estimate their relative abundances, we extended our fragment assignment by visual assistance program to search for ions representing all possible configurations, subjected to the total PTM composition constraint. This resulted in the identification of PTM configurations supported by unique fragment ions, and their relative abundances were estimated by use of a non-negative least squares procedure. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 9:804-810, 2010.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据