4.7 Review

Proteomic Contributions to Personalized Cancer Care

期刊

MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS
卷 7, 期 10, 页码 1780-1794

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/mcp.R800002-MCP200

关键词

-

资金

  1. United States Army Medical Research and Materiel Command [DAMD17-02-2-0051]
  2. NCI, National Institutes of Health [P30-CA076292]
  3. Moffitt Foundation
  4. National Institutes of Health [R01-CA106414, R01-CA123174, R01-CA102726, U01-CA101222]
  5. National Functional Genomics Center
  6. American Cancer Society [CRTG-00-196-01-CCE]
  7. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P30CA076292, U01CA101222, R01CA106414, R01CA102726, R01CA123174, R01CA112215] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cancer impacts each patient and family differently. Our current understanding of the disease is primarily limited to clinical hallmarks of cancer, but many specific molecular mechanisms remain elusive. Genetic markers can be used to determine predisposition to tumor development, but molecularly targeted treatment strategies that improve patient prognosis are not widely available for most cancers. Individualized care plans, also described as personalized medicine, still must be developed by understanding and implementing basic science research into clinical treatment. Proteomics holds great promise in contributing to the prevention and cure of cancer because it provides unique tools for discovery of biomarkers and therapeutic targets. As such, proteomics can help translate basic science discoveries into the clinical practice of personalized medicine. Here we describe how biological mass spectrometry and proteome analysis interact with other major patient care and research initiatives and present vignettes illustrating efforts in discovery of diagnostic biomarkers for ovarian cancer, development of treatment strategies in lung cancer, and monitoring prognosis and relapse in multiple myeloma patients. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 7: 1780-1794, 2008.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据