4.5 Article

ELECTRICAL POWER PREDICTION OF PROTON EXCHANGE MEMBRANE FUEL CELL BY USING SUPPORT VECTOR REGRESSION

期刊

MODERN PHYSICS LETTERS B
卷 26, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0217984912501217

关键词

Support vector regression (SVR); electrical power; proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC); modeling; regression analysis

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [CDJXS11101135]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in Universities of China [NCET-07-0903]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing, China [CSTC2006BB5240]
  4. Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars of Ministry of Education, China [2008101-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies have shown that numerous operating parameters affecting the proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) performance, such as fuel cell operating temperature, operating pressure, anode/cathode humidification temperatures, anode/cathode stoichiometric flow ratios. In order to improve performance of fuel cell systems, it is advantageous to have an accurate model with which one can predict fuel cell behavior at different operating conditions. In this paper, a model using support vector regression (SVR) approach combining with particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm for its parameter optimization was developed to modeling and predicting the electrical power of proton exchange membrane fuel cell. The accuracy and reliability of the constructed support vector regression model are validated by leave-one-out cross-validation. Prediction results show that the maximum absolute percentage error does not exceed 5%, the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) reached 0.68% and the correlation coefficient (R-2) as high as 0.998. This implies that one can estimate an available combination of controller parameters by using support vector regression model to get suitable electrical power of proton exchange membrane fuel cell system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据