4.6 Article

Gene expression analysis identifies two groups of ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas with different prognosis

期刊

MODERN PATHOLOGY
卷 24, 期 6, 页码 846-854

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2011.12

关键词

clustering analysis; high-grade serous carcinomas; outcome; PI3K-AKT pathway

资金

  1. Fundacion Mutua Madrilena-07
  2. Department of Health, Spain
  3. [FIS PI06-0950]
  4. [PI08-0410]
  5. [RTICC RD06/0020/0015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gene expression profiling is an important tool to evaluate genetic heterogeneity in carcinomas and is useful to develop expression-based classifications for many types of cancer, as well as markers of disease outcome. In this study, we have investigated the expression profile of 22 genes involved in the PI3K-AKT pathway in 26 high-grade ovarian carcinomas (19 serous and 7 clear cell carcinomas). Unsupervised hierarchical clustering divided high-grade ovarian carcinomas into three groups. Although all clear cell carcinomas clustered in one group, high-grade serous carcinomas were segregated into two separate groups with different prognosis (P = 0.05). High expression of CASP3, XIAP (X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis), NFKB1, FAS, and GSK3B mRNAs identified high-grade serous carcinomas with better prognosis. In multivariate analysis, these cluster groups were of prognostic significance independent of age, tumor size, and tumor stage (P = 0.008). To validate the mRNA expression data, we studied the immunohistochemical expression of caspase-3 and XIAP on a tissue microarray. Immunoreaction for caspase-3 was concordant with the results obtained by mRNA expression analysis (Spearman r = 0.762, P = 0.000). Caspase-3 was exclusively expressed by the macrophages. Furthermore, co-expression of caspase-3 and XIAP identified high-grade serous carcinomas with different prognosis (P = 0.03). Our results suggest that there are different biological subtypes of high-grade serous carcinomas. Modern Pathology (2011) 24, 846-854; doi:10.1038/modpathol.2011.12; published online 11 February 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据