4.6 Article

Classification using hierarchical clustering of tumor-infiltrating immune cells identifies poor prognostic ovarian cancers with high levels of COX expression

期刊

MODERN PATHOLOGY
卷 22, 期 3, 页码 373-384

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2008.187

关键词

ovarian; cancer; cyclooxygenase; clustering; CD8; CD57; CD1a

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Local immune status is influenced by the tumor microenvironment. This study aims to characterize the local immune/microenvironment status by examining tumor-infiltrating immune cells, as well as cyclooxygenase (COX) expression in tumor cells, and to analyze the relationship with the prognosis of ovarian cancers. Using immunohistochemical staining of 70 ovarian cancer specimens, the numbers of CD8+, CD57+, and CD1a+ cells infiltrating intraepithelial or stromal spaces were counted (six parameters). Hierarchical clustering was used to analyze the six parameters at one time. Expression of COX-1 and COX-2 in tumor cells was also analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Expression of both COX-1 and COX-2 was negatively correlated with intraepithelial CD8+ cells (P<0.05 for both). Hierarchical clustering using the six parameters classified ovarian cancers into three clusters. The overall and progression-free survival of cluster 1 with low CD8+ cell and high CD1a+ cell density was poorer than cluster 2 with high CD8+ cell density (P<0.05). The cluster classification did not correlate with clinical features, such as histology, stage, age, and amount of residual tumor. In a multivariate analysis, cluster 1 was an independent poor prognostic factor (P<0.05). Expression of both COX-1 and COX-2 was higher in cluster 1 than in cluster 2 (P<0.05, respectively). In conclusion, hierarchical clustering of tumor-infiltrating immune cells allows poor prognostic COX-high subgroup of ovarian cancer to be detected. COX may influence the pattern of tumor-infiltrating immune cells and prognosis in ovarian cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据