4.6 Article

TCL1A expression delineates biological and clinical variability in B-cell lymphoma

期刊

MODERN PATHOLOGY
卷 22, 期 2, 页码 206-215

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2008.148

关键词

TCL1; B-cell lymphoma; gene expression; clinical variability

资金

  1. Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo [G03/179, PI051623, PI052800, CIBER-ER]
  2. Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnologia [SAF2005-00221, SAF2004-04286, BIO 2005-01078]
  3. Fundacion la Caixa, Spain
  4. National Institute of Bioinformatics
  5. Marie Curie PhD Early Stage Research Training fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The assembly of a collection of gene-expression signatures of the major types of B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma has identified increased T-cell leukemia/lymphoma 1A (TCL1) expression in multiple lymphoma types and cases, and has enabled the investigation of the functional and clinical importance of TCL1 expression. Specifically, Burkitt's lymphoma cases show a homogeneously strong expression of TCL1, whereas diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, nodal marginal zone lymphoma, and splenic marginal zone lymphoma display a striking variability in the intensity of TCL1 staining. This was validated in two independent series. A Gene-Set Enrichment Analysis of the genes correlated with TCL1A expression found that variation in the level of expression of TCL1A was significantly associated with some of the most important gene signatures recognizing B-cell lymphoma pathogenesis and heterogeneity, such as germinal center, B-cell receptor, NF-kappa B (and its target genes), death, MAP kinases, TNFR1, TOLL, and IL1R. Additionally, TCL1 expression was correlated with shorter time to treatment in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cases and shorter lymphoma-specific survival in mantle cell lymphoma series, thus indicating the clinical and biological significance of TCL1 expression, and suggesting TCL1A as a potential therapeutic target.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据