4.4 Article

Numerical simulation and experimental validation of the microindentation test applied to bulk elastoplastic materials

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/0965-0393/20/4/045007

关键词

-

资金

  1. Chilean Council of Research and Technology CONICYT (FONDECYT) [1095195]
  2. French National Center for Scientific Research CNRS (International Scientific Cooperation Program CONICYT-CNRS)
  3. French Ministry of Education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The main objective of this work is to compare numerically simulated load-indentation depth curves together with deformation and stress fields underneath a sharp indenter for a set of mystical materials. Firstly, a numerical simulation and experimental validation of the microindentation test applied to three different bulk elastoplastic materials (copper, stainless steel and pure aluminium) using two indenters (Berkovich and spherical) are presented. The simulation of these microindentation tests is carried out using the finite element large strain elastoplastic and contact models. The corresponding results are particularly aimed at addressing the following aspects: the influence of the indenter geometry on both the load-indentation depth curve and range of plastic strains involved in the test, the comparison of the 3D results for the sharp indenter with those of the 2D approximation, the capabilities of the modelling through experimental validation of the numerical predictions and, in addition, an assessment of the indentation size effect. Secondly, the numerical results of Berkovich indentation applied to a set of mystical materials are exhaustively discussed. Although it is effectively shown that these mystical materials exhibit indistinguishable load-penetration depth curves during the loading phase, an important aspect that has not been previously addressed is that some clear differences in their responses are obtained for the unloading stage. Finally, the deformation and stress contours at the maximum indentation force and after unloading are particularly analysed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据