4.7 Article

Production performance and non-specific immunity of cage-raised red drum, Sciaenops ocellatus, fed soybean-based diets

期刊

AQUACULTURE
卷 443, 期 -, 页码 84-89

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.03.012

关键词

Red drum; Sciaenops ocellatus; Non-specific immunity; Soybean; Fishmeal; Aquaculture

资金

  1. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration under the Sea Grant Aquaculture Research Grant Program [NA100AR4170099]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A 15-week feeding trial was conducted to evaluate the replacement of fishmeal (FM) with soybean products (SP) in the diet of advanced juvenile red drum, Sciaenops ocellatus. Two dehulled, hexane-extracted SP were evaluated: commodity soybean meal [SBM; 48% crude protein (CP)] and Navita 3010 [N-3010; produced from non-genetically modified, selectively bred varieties; 54% CP]. The additive effect of a prebiotic (GroBiotic (R)-A; GBA) on the overall performance of red drumalso was evaluated. All diets were formulated to contain 35% digestible protein (DP), 15% lipid, and an estimated 3.5 kcal DE kg(-1). The reference diet was formulated to contain 44.6% Special Select (R) menhaden FM and 15.0% corn protein concentrate (CPC). Three test diets (SBM, SBM+GBA, and N-3010) were formulated to contain 6.0% FM and 15.0% CPC, together providing approximately 38% of the dietary DP. The remaining 62% DP was provided by 5.7-5.8% soy protein concentrate (SPC) and the specific SP treatment. Diets were fed to apparent satiation to advanced juvenile red drum (mean+/-SD=68+/-5.1 g initial weight) in each of four replicate 1-m(3) floating-cages. After 15 weeks of feeding, no significant differences were found among treatments for all growth performance and non-specific-immunity parameters evaluated. Based on these results, SBM or N-3010 in combination with SPC can replace approximately 86% of the DP provided by FM in the diet without negatively affecting production performance and health status of advanced juvenile red drum. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据