4.7 Article

Effects of dietary taurine supplementation on growth, feed efficiency, and nutrient composition of juvenile sablefish (Anoplopoma fimbria) fed plant based feeds

期刊

AQUACULTURE
卷 445, 期 -, 页码 79-85

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.03.030

关键词

Taurine; Sablefish; Alternative feeds; 5 parameter saturated kinetics model

资金

  1. US-Korea Joint Panel for Aquaculture [15-AQ-48]
  2. Institute of Marine and Environmental Technology [15-148]
  3. University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science [5015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Juvenile sablefish were fed a low taurine, basal feed with seven graded levels of supplemental taurine to determine taurine requirements for growth and feed efficiency. The basal feed was plant based, formulated primarily with soy and corn proteins with a minimal (9%) amount of fishmeal. The unsupplemented, basal feed contained 0.14% taurine. Experimental feeds were supplemented with 0, 0.25, 0.50, 1.0, 1.5, 3.0, and 6.0% taurine. Using the five parameter, saturated kinetic model (5 SKM), peak weight gain was predicted at 1.5% dietary taurine. Optimum weight gain, as defined as the region of the 5 SKM curve corresponding to at least 95% of peak, was predicted between 0.4% and 5.8% dietary taurine. Peak feed efficiency was predicted at 1.1% dietary taurine with optimum weight gain predicted between 0.4% and 4.2%. Whole body and muscle tissue protein and lipid content were not affected by taurine supplementation. Tissue taurine content increased asymptotically with increasing dietary taurine supplementation. Whole body tissue became saturated at 0.25 +/- 0.02% taurine, expressed on a wet weight basis. Muscle tissue became saturated at 0.34 +/- 0.02% taurine. Results fromthis study should increase the performance of alternative, plant based feeds formulated for sablefish and enable regulatory agencies better estimate the potential human exposure to taurine fromthe consumption of sablefish receiving these feeds. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据