4.5 Review

Beyond the Reproductive Effect of Sex Steroids: Their Role During Immunity to Helminth Parasite Infections

期刊

MINI-REVIEWS IN MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 12, 期 11, 页码 1071-1080

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/138955712802762149

关键词

Sex steroids; immunity; parasites; helminthes; infections

资金

  1. Programa de Apoyo a Proyectos de Innovacion Tecnologica, Direccion General de Asuntos del Personal Academico, UNAM [IN214011-3]
  2. Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnologia del Distrito Federal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During the helminth infections, the immune system tends to be modulated by host's sex hormones. Actually, many studies show the reciprocal relationship between sex steroids, the immune system and the elimination or establishment of helminth parasites. Is well known that innate immune response determines the type of adaptive immune response, so the effects in the innate immune response by hormones may affect subsequent adaptive immunity. The sex steroids as estrogens, progesterone and testosterone regulate growth, differentiation, survival and function of many cell types that could be involved in process like homeostasis and immunity, but also have a direct effect on the helminthes, that may probably be mediated by specific receptors on these parasites. Sex steroids, parasites and immunity are closely connected, and their interconnection is involved in the maintenance of elimination or establishment of helminthes in an immunocompetent host. For that reason, understanding the action's mechanisms of sex steroids on immune cells and its direct effect on helminth parasites is important for further progress in the development of novel therapies for chronic helminth diseases associated to immune dysregulation. In this review, we will describe the effects of sex steroids on the immune response during helminth infections as well as the direct effect in these parasites, and the possible implications of these effects on the incidence of several helminth infections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据