4.4 Article

Randomised-controlled trial of two antenatal education programmes

期刊

MIDWIFERY
卷 25, 期 2, 页码 114-125

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2006.12.012

关键词

Childbirth education; Pregnancy; Randomised control trial; Programme evaluation

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: to determine whether a new antenatal education programme with increased parenting content could improve parenting outcomes for women compared with a regular antenatal education programme. Design: a randomised-controlled trial. Data were collected through self-report surveys. Setting: specialist referral maternity hospital in Sydney, Australia. Participants: 170 women birthing at the hospital. Ninety-one women attended the new programme and 79 the regular programme. Intervention: a new antenatal education programme ('Having a Baby' programme) developed from needs assessment data collected from expectant and new parents. One important feature of the programme was the recognition that pregnancy, tabour, birth and early parenting were a microcosm of the childbearing experience, rather than separate topics. Measures: the primary outcome measure was perceived maternal parenting self-efficacy. Worry about the baby, and perceived parenting knowledge, were secondary outcome measures. They were measured before the programme and after birth. Birth outcomes were also recorded. Findings: the postnatal perceived maternal parenting self-efficacy scores of women who attended the 'Having a Baby' programme were significantly higher than those who attended the regular programme. Perceived parenting knowledge scores of women who attended the 'Having a Baby' programme were also significantly higher than those who attended the regular programme. Worry scores were lower but they did not reach statistical significant. Birth outcomes were similar. Implications for practice: the 'Having a Baby' programme improved maternal self-efficacy and parenting knowledge. Parenting programmes that continue in the early postnatal period may be beneficial. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据