4.4 Article

Wavelet coherence analysis of prefrontal tissue oxyhaemoglobin signals as measured using near-infrared spectroscopy in elderly subjects with cerebral infarction

期刊

MICROVASCULAR RESEARCH
卷 95, 期 -, 页码 108-115

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.mvr.2014.08.001

关键词

Near-infrared spectroscopy; Wavelet coherence; Phase coherence; Functional connectivity; Cerebral infarction; Cerebral oxygenation; Spontaneous oscillations; Prefrontal cortex; Elderly; Resting state

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81071223, 31371002, 11272273]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to assess the prefrontal functional connectivity using wavelet coherence analysis of cerebral tissue oxyhaemoglobin concentration (Delta [HbO(2)]) signals in elderly subjects with cerebral infarction (CI) during the resting state. Continuous recordings of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) signals were obtained from the left and right prefrontal lobes in 10 subjects with CI (age: 74.4 +/- 9.0 years) and 18 healthy elderly subjects (age: 69.9 +/- 7.3 years) during the resting state. The coherence between left and right prefrontal Delta [HbO(2)] oscillations in four frequency intervals (I,0.6-2 Hz; II, 0.145-0.6 Hz; III, 0.052-0.145 Hz and IV, 0.021-0.052 Hz) was analyzed using wavelet coherence analysis. In healthy elderly subjects, the Delta [HbO(2)] oscillations were significantly wavelet coherent in intervals land III (p < 0.05), wavelet phase coherent in intervals from I to IV. In elderly subjects with CI, the left and right Delta [HbO(2)] oscillations were significantly wavelet coherent and phase coherent in interval I (p < 0.05). In elderly subjects with CI, the power and phase coherences were significantly lower in interval III (p < 0.01) than in healthy subjects. The difference in wavelet coherence between the healthy elderly and elderly with CI indicates an altered brain functional connectivity in CI patients. This may be useful for assessing the effectiveness of functional recovery following a CI. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据