4.4 Article

Assessment of cerebral oxygenation oscillations in subjects with hypertension

期刊

MICROVASCULAR RESEARCH
卷 88, 期 -, 页码 32-41

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.mvr.2013.04.003

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81071223]
  2. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation [ZR2010HM024]
  3. Independent Innovation Foundation of Shandong University (IIFSDU) [2010JQ007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The objective of this study was to assess the spontaneous oscillations in subjects with hypertension based on the wavelet transform of cerebral oxygenation signal measured with near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). Methods: Continuous recordings of NIRS and arterial blood pressure (ABP) signals were obtained from simultaneous measurements in 20 healthy subjects (age: 70.8 +/- 5.2 years) and 22 subjects with hypertension (age: 72.5 +/- 6.8 years). Results: Using spectral analysis based on wavelet transform, five frequency intervals were identified (I, 0.4-2 Hz; II, 0.15-0.4 Hz; III, 0.06-0.15 Hz; IV, 0.02-0.06 Hz and V, 0.005-0.02 Hz). The amplitudes of Delta[Hb] and Delta[HbO(2)] in intervals I, II and III were significantly higher in hypertensive patients, who have increased mean flow velocity in middle cerebral artery (MCA), compared to that in the healthy subjects (p < 0.01). The amplitudes of the ABP in frequency intervals III and V were significantly higher in hypertensive patients than in the healthy subjects (p < 0.01). Conclusions: The present findings revealed that hypertension and increased mean flow velocity in MCA have significant effect on the cerebral oscillations. The higher cerebral oscillations might be related to the intracerebral atherosclerosis in response to systemic hypertension. In addition, the higher spontaneous oscillations in intervals III and V in ABP indicate a metabolic regulation and myogenic response to hypertension. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据