4.5 Article

Recognition, Presence, and Survival of Locust Central Nervous Glia In Situ and In Vitro

期刊

MICROSCOPY RESEARCH AND TECHNIQUE
卷 72, 期 5, 页码 385-397

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jemt.20683

关键词

glia; insect; central nervous system; cell culture; survival

资金

  1. Marianne and Dr. Fritz Walter Fischer-Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Insect glial cells serve functions for the formation, maintenance, and performance of the central nervous system in ways similar to their vertebrate counterparts. Characterization of physiological mechanisms that underlie the roles of glia in invertebrates is largely incomplete, partly due to the lack of markers that universally label all types of glia throughout all developmental stages in various species. Studies on primary cell cultures from brains of Locusta migratoria demonstrated that the absence of anti-HRP immunoreactivity, which has previously been used to identify glial cells in undissociated brains, can also serve as a reliable glial marker in vitro, but only in combination with a viability test. As cytoplasmic membranes of cultured cells are prone to degradation when they lose viability, only cells that are both anti-HRP immunonegative and viable should be regarded as glial cells, whereas the lack of anti-HRP immunoreactivity alone is not sufficient. Cell viability can be assessed by the pattern of nuclear staining with DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole), a convenient, sensitive labeling method that can be used in combination with other immunocytochemical cellular markers. We determined the glia-to-neuron ratio in central brains of fourth nymphal stage of Locusta migratoria to be 1:2 both in situ and in dissociated primary cell cultures. Analysis of primary cell cultures revealed a progressive reduction of glial cells and indicated that dead cells detach from the substrate and vanish from the analysis. Such changes in the composition of cell cultures should be considered in future physiological studies on cell Cultures from insect nervous systems. Microsc. Res. Tech. 72:385-397, 2009. (C) 2008 Wiley-Liss.Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据