4.4 Article

Long-term clinical course and outcome of schizophrenia in rural Ethiopia: 10-year follow-up of a population-based cohort

期刊

SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH
卷 161, 期 2-3, 页码 414-420

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.10.053

关键词

Schizophrenia; Course; Outcome; Gender; Follow-up study; Ethiopia

资金

  1. Stanley Medical Research Institute (SMRI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Although the few available studies from LMICs report favorable outcome, the course of schizophrenia is more complex than has been indicated so far. Methods: A sample of 361 people with a standardized clinical diagnosis of schizophrenia were recruited from a predominantly rural community in Ethiopia and followed up regularly for an average of 10 years. Psychiatrists used the Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation chart to carry out assessment of illness course. Duration of time in clinical remission was the primary outcome. Result: About 61.0% of the patients remained under active follow-up, while 18.1% (n = 65) were deceased. The mean percentage of follow-up time in complete remission was 28.4% (SD = 33.0). Female patients were significantly more likely to have episodic illness course with no inter-episode residual or negative symptoms (chi(2) = 6.28, P = 0.012). Nearly 14.0% had continuous psychotic symptoms for over 75% of their follow-up time. Only 18.1% achieved complete remission for over 75% of their follow-up time. Later onset of illness was the only significant predictor of achieving full remission for over 50% of follow-up time in a fully adjusted model. Conventional antipsychotic medications were fairly well tolerated in 80% of the patients and 4.2% (n = 15) experienced tardive dyskinesia. Conclusion: This population-based study is one of the very few long-term outcome studies of schizophrenia in LMICs. The study demonstrated clearly a differential and more favorable course and outcome for female patients but overall course and outcome of schizophrenia appeared less favorable in this setting than has been reported from other LMICs. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据