4.6 Article

Shared Immune and Repair Markers During Experimental Toxoplasma Chronic Brain Infection and Schizophrenia

期刊

SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN
卷 42, 期 2, 页码 386-395

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbv134

关键词

Toxoplasma gondii; animal model; biomarker

资金

  1. Stanley Medical Research Institute
  2. European Union [286334]
  3. Virgo consortium
  4. Dutch Government [FES0908]
  5. Netherlands Genomics Initiative [050-060-452]
  6. Dutch Fund for Economic Structure Reinforcement, the NeuroBasic PharmaPhenomics project [0908]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic neurologic infection with Toxoplasma gondii is relatively common in humans and is one of the strongest known risk factors for schizophrenia. Nevertheless, the exact neuropathological mechanisms linking T gondii infection and schizophrenia remain unclear. Here we utilize a mouse model of chronic T gondii infection to identify protein biomarkers that are altered in serum and brain samples at 2 time points during chronic infection. Furthermore, we compare the identified biomarkers to those differing between postmortem brain samples from 35 schizophrenia patients and 33 healthy controls. Our findings suggest that T gondii infection causes substantial and widespread immune activation indicative of neural damage and reactive tissue repair in the animal model that partly overlaps with changes observed in the brains of schizophrenia patients. The overlapping changes include increases in C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta), interferon gamma (IFN gamma), plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1 (TIMP-1), and vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1). Potential roles of these factors in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia and toxoplasmosis are discussed. Identifying a defined set of markers shared within the pathophysiological landscape of these diseases could be a key step towards understanding their specific contributions to pathogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据