4.7 Article

Silver-mordenite for radiologic gas capture from complex streams: Dual catalytic CH3I decomposition and I confinement

期刊

MICROPOROUS AND MESOPOROUS MATERIALS
卷 200, 期 -, 页码 297-303

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2014.04.041

关键词

Mordenite; Methyl iodide; Synchrotron; Pair distribution function (PDF); Fission gas capture

资金

  1. U.S. DOE/NE/FCRD-SWG
  2. U.S. DOE's NNSA [DE-AC04-94AL85000]
  3. USDOE [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy, under DOE Idaho Operations Office [DE-AC07-05ID14517]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The selective capture of radiological iodine (I-129) is a persistent concern for safe nuclear energy. In nuclear fuel reprocessing scenarios, the gas streams to be treated are extremely complex, containing several distinct iodine-containing molecules amongst a large variety of other species. Silver-containing mordenite (MOR) is a longstanding benchmark for radioiodine capture, reacting with molecular iodine (I-2) to form AgI. However the mechanisms for organoiodine capture is not well understood. Here we investigate the capture of methyl iodide from complex mixed gas streams by combining chemical analysis of the effluent gas stream with in depth characterization of the recovered sorbent. Tools applied include infrared spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis with mass spectrometry, micro X-ray fluorescence, powder X-ray diffraction analysis, and pair distribution function analysis. The MOR zeolite catalyzes decomposition of the methyl iodide through formation of surface methoxy species (SMS), which subsequently reacts with water in the mixed gas stream to form methanol, and with methanol to form dimethyl ether, which are both detected downstream in the effluent. The liberated iodine reacts with Ag in the MOR pore to the form subnanometer AgI clusters, smaller than the MOR pores, suggesting that the iodine is both physically and chemically confined within the zeolite. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据