4.7 Article

Ion-imprinted mesoporous silica hybrids for selective recognition of target metal ions

期刊

MICROPOROUS AND MESOPOROUS MATERIALS
卷 180, 期 -, 页码 162-171

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2013.06.010

关键词

Ion-imprinted; Periodic mesoporous organosilica; Selective recognition; Metal ions

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning, Korea (Acceleration Research Program) [20130000108]
  3. Pioneer Research Center Program [2013-0000421/2013-0000422]
  4. WCU Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel ion-imprinted functional ligand derivative bearing periodic mesoporous organosilica (IIPMO) was obtained using a sol-gel process from a chemically synthesized organopolysilane precursor with a metal template (Co2+ ion) imprinted ligand centre with tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS) and cetyltrimethylammoniumbromide (CTAB) as a structural directing surfactant under basic conditions. The imprinted metal template was easily leached out from the hybrid materials during an acid treatment, which resulted in a template-free ion-imprinted network in the PMO pore wall framework with an unaltered particle size and morphology. The ion-imprinted hybrid PMO materials were characterized by X-ray diffraction, Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, solid-state Si-29 and C-13 cross polarization magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, N-2 adsorption-desorption analysis and elemental analysis. Furthermore, the removal of the imprinted metal template was confirmed by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy. The selective rebinding ability of the template ions on the ion-imprinted PMO hybrid adsorbents was examined using a cobalt nitrate solution. The rebinding results showed that the selective efficiency of Co2+ ions on the IIPMOs were 10.1, 7.4 and 9.3 for Cu2+, Cd2+ and Zn2+, respectively. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据