4.7 Article

Preparation of sucrose-based microporous carbons and their application as electrode materials for supercapacitors

期刊

MICROPOROUS AND MESOPOROUS MATERIALS
卷 156, 期 -, 页码 176-180

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2012.02.043

关键词

Electrochemical capacitor; Electrode; Sucrose; Carbonization; Microporous carbon

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20803037, 21143006]
  2. Doctoral Foundation of Shandong Province [BS200704022]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2009BM013]
  4. Foundation of Qingdao Municipal Science and Technology Commission [11-2-4-2-(8)-jch]
  5. Taishan Scholars program of Shandong Province, China
  6. ARC [FT100100879]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microporous carbon materials were prepared by carbonization of sulfuric acid-pretreated sucrose. The pore size and specific surface area of the samples were measured to be in the ranges of 0.7-1.2 nm and 178-603 m(2)/g, respectively. The pore parameters were found to depend strongly on the carbonization temperature. Raman spectra showed that the intensity of the G band was stronger than that of the D band for the samples obtained with carbonization temperatures above 800 degrees C. It was also found that the sample carbonized at 800 degrees C displayed the highest specific surface area with a main pore size of about 0.75 nm. This sample exhibited the highest specific capacitance (232 F/g) at a current density of 0.1 A/g and lowest electrical resistance based on the results of cyclic voltammetry, galvanostatic charge-discharge and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). All samples displayed a good cycle performance behavior evaluated using both three-electrode and two-electrode cells. Based on the experimental results, the formation mechanism of the carbon materials as well as the relationship between the pore structure and their electrochemical properties were analyzed and discussed. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved,

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据