4.7 Article

Facile synthesis of mesoporous Ag-loaded TiO2 thin film and its photocatalytic properties

期刊

MICROPOROUS AND MESOPOROUS MATERIALS
卷 149, 期 1, 页码 69-75

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.08.030

关键词

Mesoporous; Ag/TiO2; Films; Photodegradation; 2-Chlorophenol

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ag nanoparticles highly dispersed into TiO2 thin films are synthesized via a remarkably simple one-pot route in the presence of a P123 triblock copolymer as template directing and reducing agents, where the reduction of Ag+ to Ag-0 by in situ heat-induced reduction through the oxidation of template at 400 degrees C and the controlled polymerization of TiO2 take place simultaneously. The obtained mesoporous Ag/TiO2 films deposited on soda-lime glass were optically transparent and crack-free. SEM and Kr adsorption clearly prove that Ag/TiO2 films at different Ag contents are mesoporous with large surface area and regularly ordered mesopores and the thickness of the obtained films is similar to 280 +/- 20 nm. The pristine TiO2 film exhibits a specific surface area of 63 cm(2)/cm(2) and specific pore volume of 0.013 mm(3)/cm(2) that it is decreased to 42 cm(2)/cm(2) and 0.010 mm(3)/cm(2) respectively as a result of Ag-loaded mesoporous TiO2. The newly prepared photocatalysts Ag/TiO2 films were evaluated for their photocatalytic degradation of 2-chlorophenol as a model reaction. It was found that the meso-ordered Ag/TiO2 films are more photoactive 8 times than nonporous commercial photocatalysts Pilkington Glass Activ (TM). The recycling tests indicated that Ag/TiO2 films was quite stable during that liquid-solid heterogeneous photocatalysis since no significant decrease in activity was observed even after being used repetitively for 10 times, showing a good potential in practical application. In general, the cubic mesoporous Ag/TiO2 nanocomposites are stable and can be recycled without loss of their photochemical activity. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据