4.7 Article

MIL-100(V) - A mesoporous vanadium metal organic framework with accessible metal sites

期刊

MICROPOROUS AND MESOPOROUS MATERIALS
卷 157, 期 -, 页码 18-23

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.12.001

关键词

Vanadium; Porous framework; IR-spectroscopy; Gas adsorption; Synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction

资金

  1. Ministere de l'Education et de la Recherche
  2. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  3. Pioneer Research Center Program, National Research Foundation of Korea
  4. MEST [2010-0019531]
  5. French ANR 'NOMAC' [ANR-06-C02-008]
  6. region Lower Normandy
  7. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0019531] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The large pore vanadium(III) trimesate MIL-100(V), i.e. V3O(H2O)(2)X[C9H3O6](2)center dot yH(2)O with x = (C9H5O6)(z)(-), y approximate to 3 and z approximate to 0.3, has been synthesized under hydrothermal conditions (MIL stands for Materials from Institute Lavoisier). Its structure, which crystallizes in the space group Fd-3m (No. 227) with a = 73.0286(2) angstrom, V= 389474.4(2) angstrom(3), exhibits a zeotype architecture with mesoporous cages of approx. 25 and 29 angstrom diameter, accessible through microporous windows of 5.5 and 8.9 angstrom diameter. Synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction analysis confirms its isostructural character with previously reported MIL-100(Cr, Fe, Al) solids. Its thermal stability under O-2 and N-2, up to 523 K (250 degrees C), is comparable to that of MIL-100(Fe). Preliminary gas adsorption experiments and in situ IR-spectroscopy after NO exposure reveal that MIL-100(V) combines high sorption capacities and co-ordinatively unsaturated vanadium sites in different oxidation states (+III and +IV). With these properties this material could be a promising candidate for specific sorption or redox catalytic applications. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据