4.7 Article

Raman spectroscopic study of the framework structure of amorphous mesoporous titania

期刊

MICROPOROUS AND MESOPOROUS MATERIALS
卷 119, 期 1-3, 页码 267-275

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2008.10.027

关键词

Mesoporous titania; Raman spectra; Amorphous titania; Rutile formation; Crystallization

资金

  1. New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Raman spectroscopy has been applied to investigate the structure of amorphous mesoporous titania and six different cation-incorporated mesoporous titania samples with the surface areas of ca. 800 m(2) g(-1). A phase transition into mesoporous anatase was commonly observed around 673 K. Spectral patterns similar to those of anatase and rutile were detected in all of the amorphous mesoporous solids when they were calcined between 493 and 653 K, though the positions of the anatase E-g and the rutile E-g bands were significantly different from those of the respective bulk solids. A sudden shift in the band position was observed around 673 K, which is the temperature where the peaks due to anatase emerged in the XRD. We counted the frequencies that the spectral patterns of anatase and rutile were obtained in the measurements of the samples calcined between 493 and 573 K. The frequency of the rutile pattern was enhanced by the incorporation of Fe3+, Nb5+ and Mo6+ and was suppressed by Al3+ and Ce3+/4+. The mechanism behind this enhancement/suppression effect is discussed. The Raman spectrum after the extraction of the template (before the heat treatment) did not correspond with any of the known spectral patterns of titania. This unknown pattern re-appeared at 653 K in the most of the mesoporous titania samples that we investigated in this study. On the other hand, the anatase or rutile patterns were not observed at this temperature. A structural model of the amorphous framework in mesoporous titania and a mechanism for the crystallization into anatase are proposed. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据