4.7 Article

Direct synthesis of mesoporous silica presenting large and tunable pores using BAB triblock copolymers: Influence of each copolymer block on the porous structure

期刊

MICROPOROUS AND MESOPOROUS MATERIALS
卷 112, 期 1-3, 页码 612-620

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.10.051

关键词

triblock copolymer; synthesis; mesoporous silica; nitrogen adsorption

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mesoporous silicas with large and tunable (from 4 to 40 nm) accessible pores have been successfully synthesized using laboratory-made BAB (A: hydrophilic block, B: hydrophobic block) type triblock copolymers as templates. A direct synthesis is carried out in the absence of swelling agent and without any further treatment. The polystyrene-b-poly(ethylene oxide)-b-polystyrene (PS-b-PEO-b-PS) copolymers were synthesized using living/controlled radical polymerization. The porous structure (mesopore size, size distribution and microporous volume) was characterized using electron transmission microscopy and nitrogen sorption measurements. This study is focused on the control of the porous structure as a function of the hydrophobic PS block length and the hydrophilic block length (whilst keeping the other block length constant). It was found that when the PS block length increases: (i) the mesopore size increases linearly with PS block length which thus proffers a fine tuning of the pore diameter from 4 to 40 nm, (ii) the micropore volume decreases. When the PEO block length increases, (i) the mesopore size decreases (ii) the micropore volume increases. All these results were explained considering (i) that both PS and PEO block lengths have an influence on the degree of stretching of the PS chains, thus on the micellar core radius (ii) that the mesopore size is directly connected to the micellar core radius, i.e. that PEO chains do not directly participate to mesoporosity (due to its particular loop configuration) but only to microporosity. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据