4.1 Article

Shrunken Pore Syndrome is associated with a sharp rise in mortality in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/00365513.2015.1099724

关键词

Coronary artery bypass; creatinine; cystatinC; glomerular filtration rate; mortality determinants

资金

  1. Skane University Hospital Funds
  2. Alfred Osterlund Foundation
  3. Greta and Johan Kock Foundation
  4. Medical Faculty of the University of Lund
  5. Region Skane

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Shrunken Pore Syndrome was recently suggested for the pathophysiologic state in patients characterized by an estimation of their glomerular filtration rate (GFR) based upon cystatinC, which is lower or equal to 60% of their estimated GFR based upon creatinine, i.e. when eGFR(cystatinC)60% of eGFR(creatinine). Not only the cystatinC level, but also the levels of other low molecular mass proteins are increased in this condition. The preoperative plasma levels of cystatinC and creatinine were measured in 1638 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting. eGFR(cystatinC) and eGFR(creatinine) were calculated using two pairs of estimating equations, CAPA and LMrev, and CKD-EPIcystatinC and CKD-EPIcreatinine, respectively. The Shrunken Pore Syndrome was present in 2.1% of the patients as defined by the CAPA and LMrev equations and in 5.7% of the patients as defined by the CKD-EPIcystatinC and CKD-EPIcreatinine equations. The patients were studied over a median follow-up time of 3.5 years (2.0-5.0 years) and the mortality determined. Shrunken Pore Syndrome defined by both pairs of equations was a strong, independent, predictor of long-term mortality as evaluated by Cox analysis and as illustrated by Kaplan-Meier curves. Increased mortality was observed also for the subgroups of patients with GFR above or below 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2). Changing the cut-off level from 60 to 70% for the CAPA and LMrev equations increased the number of patients with Shrunken Pore Syndrome to 6.5%, still displaying increased mortality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据