4.1 Article

Insulin Inhibits Low Oxygen-Induced ATP Release from Human Erythrocytes: Implication for Vascular Control

期刊

MICROCIRCULATION
卷 16, 期 5, 页码 424-433

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1080/10739680902855218

关键词

erythrocyte; ATP; insulin; hyperinsulinemia; prediabetes

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL-64180, HL-89094]
  2. American Diabetes Association [RA-133]
  3. Amercian Heart Association Fellowship
  4. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [T32HL007209, R01HL064180, R33HL089094] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: ATP released from human erythrocytes in response to reduced oxygen tension (pO2) participates in the matching of oxygen (O2) supply with need in skeletal muscle by stimulating increases in blood flow to areas with increased O2 demand. Here, we investigated the hypothesis that hyperinsulinemia inhibits ATP release from erythrocytes and impairs their ability to stimulate dilation of isolated arterioles exposed to decreased extraluminal pO2. Materials and Methods: Erythrocyte ATP release was stimulated pharmacologically (mastoparan 7) and physiologically (reduced pO2) in the absence or presence of insulin. We also examined the ability of isolated skeletal muscle arterioles perfused with buffer containing erythrocytes treated with insulin or its vehicle (saline) to dilate in response to decreased extraluminal pO2. Results: Insulin significantly attenuated mastoparan 7- and reduced pO2-induced ATP release. In vessels perfused with untreated erythrocytes, low extraluminal pO2 resulted in an increase in vessel diameter. In contrast, when erythrocytes were treated with insulin, no vasodilation occurred. Conclusions: These studies demonstrate that insulin inhibits ATP release from erythrocytes in response to reduced pO2 and impairs their ability to stimulate dilation of skeletal muscle arterioles. These results suggest that hyperinsulinemia could hinder the matching of O2 supply with need in skeletal muscle.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据