4.1 Article

The Effect of Ovariectomy and Estrogen on Penetrating Brain Arterioles and Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability

期刊

MICROCIRCULATION
卷 16, 期 8, 页码 685-693

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.3109/10739680903164131

关键词

estrogen; brain arterioles; myogenic tone; blood-brain barrier

资金

  1. American Heart Association Established Investigator Award [0540081N]
  2. NIH National Institutes of Neurologic Disorders and Stroke [NS045940, RO1 NS40071, RO1 NSO43316]
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R01NS043316, R01NS045940, R01NS040071] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: We investigated the effect of estrogen replacement on the structure and function of penetrating brain arterioles (PA) and blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability. Materials and Methods: Female ovariectomized Sprague-Dawley rats were replaced with estradiol (E-2) and estriol (E-3) (OVX + E; N = 13) and compared to ovariectomized animals without replacement (OVX; N = 14) and intact controls (CTL, proestrous; N = 13). Passive and active diameters, percent tone, and passive distensibility of pressurized PA were compared. In addition, BBB permeability to Lucifer Yellow, a marker of transcellular transport, was compared in cerebral arteries. Results: Ovariectomy increased myogenic tone in PA, compared to CTL, that was not ameliorated by estrogen treatment. Percent tone at 75 mmHg for CTL vs. OVX and OVX + E was 44 +/- 3% vs. 51 +/- 1% and 54 +/- 3% (P < 0.01 vs. CTL for both). No differences were found in passive diameters or distensibility between the groups. BBB permeability increased 500% in OVX vs. CTL animals; however, estrogen replacement restored barrier properties: flux of Lucifer Yellow for CTL, OVX, and OVX + E was (ng/mL): 3.4 +/- 1.2, 20.2 +/- 5.3 (P < 0.01 vs. CTL), and 6.15 +/- 1.2 (n.s.). Conclusions: These results suggest that estrogen replacement may not be beneficial for small-vessel disease in the brain, but may limit BBB disruption and edema under conditions that cause it. Microcirculation (2009) 16, 685-693. doi:10.3109/10739680903164131

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据