4.7 Review

Recent trends in SELEX technique and its application to food safety monitoring

期刊

MICROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 181, 期 5-6, 页码 479-491

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-013-1156-7

关键词

SELEX; Aptamer; Food safety; Rapid detection; Biosensor

资金

  1. Huangshan Young Scholar Fund of Hefei University of Technology [407-037025]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31328009]
  3. NSF of Jiangsu Province [BK20130379, 13KJB550001]
  4. Science and Technology Research Project of General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of P.R. China [201210127, 201310135]
  5. 12th Five Years Key Programs [2012BAK08B01-2, 2012BAK17B10, SS2012AA101001]
  6. Suzhou Science and Technology Committee Program [SS201335]
  7. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2013HGCH0008, 2012HGCX0003]
  8. National Cancer Institute [R21CA137703]
  9. National Institute of General Medicine (NIGMS) [5P30 GM103332]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The method referred to as systemic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX) was introduced in 1990 and ever since has become an important tool for the identification and screening of aptamers. Such nucleic acids can recognize and bind to their corresponding targets (analytes) with high selectivity and affinity, and aptamers therefore have become attractive alternatives to traditional antibodies not the least because they are much more stable. Meanwhile, they have found numerous applications in different fields including food quality and safety monitoring. This review first gives an introduction into the selection process and to the evolution of SELEX, then covers applications of aptamers in the surveillance of food safety (with subsections on absorptiometric, electrochemical, fluorescent and other methods), and then gives conclusions and perspectives. The SELEX method excels by its features of in vitro, high throughput and ease of operation. This review contains 86 references.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据