4.7 Article

Determination of trace mercury in environmental samples by cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry after cloud point extraction

期刊

MICROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 171, 期 3-4, 页码 313-319

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-010-0429-7

关键词

Cloud point extraction; Mercury; Atomic fluorescence spectrometry

资金

  1. State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology
  2. Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KF2008-01]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [10ZG01]
  5. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-10-0341]
  6. Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry [[2009]1001]
  7. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province [B2010001676]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A sensitive method is presented for the determination of ultra-trace levels of mercury using cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry along with cloud point extraction. Preconcentration is based on the complexation of Hg(II) by dithizone, followed by micelle-mediated extraction of the complex using the surfactant Triton X-114. Foaming, which is always observed when generating vapor mercury in the presence of surfactant, was strongly reduced by using SnCl(2) as a reducing reagent, and a homemade gas-liquid separator. Variables that affect the assay were optimized. These included pH value, concentration of chelating reagent, concentration of Triton X-114, equilibration temperature and time. The preconcentration of a 45-mL sample gave an enhancement factor of 29. The calibration graph is linear in the range from 0.05 to 5.0 ngmL(-1) with a correlation coefficient of 0.9991. The limit of detection (3 delta) obtained under the optimal conditions is 5 pgmL(-1). The relative standard deviation for seven replicate determinations at 0.5 ngmL(-1) level is 5.2%. The method was successfully applied to the determination of Hg in real samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据