4.7 Article

Exploiting ion-pair formation for the enhancement of electroanalytical determination of pyridoxine (B6) onto polyurethane-graphite electrodes

期刊

MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 99, 期 2, 页码 186-192

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2011.05.003

关键词

pyridoxine determination; pyridoxine ion-pairs; sodium dodecyl sulphate; square-wave voltammetry; graphite-polyurethane electrodes

资金

  1. FAPERJ [E-26/110.092/2010, E-26/101.719/2010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study reports some aspects of ion-pair formation between pyridoxine and dodecyl sulphate under suitable conditions of pH. and its application with analytical purposes. Electrochemical behavior of the analite onto a graphite-polyurethane electrode was assessed by both cyclic and square-wave voltammetries under different conditions (pH from 1.2 to 13.0, with and without surfactant), aiming to study its mechanisms and to define best parameters for such determination exploiting the association of electroanalytical variables and ion-pair formation; besides these, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy was also applied to evaluate ion-pair formation and its influence on interfacial fenomena. Best conditions were reach by square-wave voltammetry in pH 4.2 acetate buffer sweeping from +0.7 to + 1.2 V (vs. Ag vertical bar AgClsar) in pulses of 50 mV amplitude and 10 mV step, in a frequency of 10 Hz. The concentration of sodium dodecyl sulphate was optimized being the optimal value a constant submicelar concentration of 3 mmol L-1. Under such conditions a linear dynamic range from 2 to 18 mu mol L-1 was observed, providing faster, more selective and sensitive system. Interference studies were also carried out showing no relevant influence of thiamine, riboflavine and nicotinamide over the analysis of pyridoxine. The system was successfully applied to commercial parenteral samples containing thiamine and pyridoxine as purchased, without further treatment. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据