4.7 Article

Ultrasound-assisted extraction of gold and silver from environmental samples using different extractants followed by electrothermal-atomic absorption spectrometry

期刊

MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 97, 期 2, 页码 93-100

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2010.07.011

关键词

Ultrasound-assisted extraction; Cup-horn sonoreactor; Noble metals; Silver and gold; Electrothermal-atomic absorption; spectrometry

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [CTQ2009-06956/BQU]
  2. Vigo University [09VIA08]
  3. Xunta de Galicia
  4. University of Vigo

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ultrasound-assisted extraction combined with electrothermal-atomic absorption spectrometry has been applied to the determination of silver and gold at mu g g(-1) levels in different environmental samples such as soil, sediment, fly ash and industrial sludge. Two different extraction systems have been tried, i.e. acid mixtures (HCI, HF, and HNO3) and thiourea in diluted H2SO4 medium. In both cases, an efficient cup-horn sonoreactor was used as ultrasonic device to accelerate the extraction process. This ultrasonic processor allows the use of any extractant including HF and simultaneous treatment of up to six samples. Recovery ranged from 81% to 107% for silver, and from 91% to 105% for gold. Optimal acid mixtures were 25% v/v HNO3 + 25% v/v HF for Ag and 25% v/v HNO3 + 25% v/v HCI for Au. The thiourea method required 0.6% m/v thiourea + 2% v/v H2SO4. The latter method was considered advantageous since efficient Au and Ag extractions were obtained in a short time, and moreover, wastes generated were less harmful to the environment. Limits of detection for Ag and Au were 0.012 and 0.050 mu g g(-1), respectively. Repeatability expressed as relative standard deviation ranged from 2 to 10% for both metals. Both extraction methods were applied to the determination of Au and Ag in sediments and soils located at different sampling points from Galicia (Spain). (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据