4.2 Article

Identification and localization of the multiple bacterial symbionts of the termite gut flagellate Joenia annectens

期刊

MICROBIOLOGY-SGM
卷 156, 期 -, 页码 2068-2079

出版社

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.037267-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
  2. Max Planck Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The hindgut of wood-feeding lower termites is densely colonized by a multitude of symbiotic micro-organisms. While it is well established that the eukaryotic flagellates play a major role in the degradation of lignocellulose, much less is known about the identity and function of the prokaryotic symbionts associated with the flagellates. Our ultrastructural investigations of the gut flagellate Joenia annectens (from the termite Kalotermes flavicollis) revealed a dense colonization of this flagellate by diverse ecto- and endosymbiotic bacteria. Phylogenetic analysis of the small-subunit rRNA gene sequences combined with fluorescence in situ hybridization allowed us to identify and localize the different morphotypes. Furthermore, we could show that K. flavicollis harbours two phylotypes of J. annectens that could be distinguished not only by their small-subunit rRNA gene sequences, but also by differences in their assemblages of bacterial symbionts. Each of the flagellate populations hosted phylogenetically distinct ectosymbionts from the phylum Bacteroidetes, one of them closely related to the ectosymbionts of other termite gut flagellates. A single phylotype of 'Endomicrobia' was consistently associated with only one of the host phylotypes, although not all individuals were colonized, corroborating that 'Endomicrobia' symbionts do not always cospeciate with their host lineages. Flagellates from both populations were loosely associated with a single phylotype of Spirochaetales attached to their cell surface in varying abundance. Current evidence for the involvement of Bacteroidales and 'Endomicrobia' symbionts in the nitrogen metabolism of the host flagellate is discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据