4.2 Article

Characterization of cell-cycle-driven and light-driven gene expression in a synchronous culture system in the unicellular rhodophyte Cyanidioschyzon merolae

期刊

MICROBIOLOGY-SGM
卷 156, 期 -, 页码 1730-1737

出版社

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.037754-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Society for Promotion of Science (JSPS) [18017005, 20017006, 16GS0304]
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan
  3. Takeda Science Foundation
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18017005] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The unicellular rhodophyte Cyanidioschyzon merolae, having a single plastid and a single mitochondrion, is suitable for the analysis of the cell cycle involving the division of organelles. In conventional methods of synchronous culture of algae, light/dark cycles have been used as signals for synchronization, and the gene expression promoted by light is not separated from the gene expression related to cell cycle progression. We previously devised a novel synchronous culture system with controlled photosynthesis, which is triggered by 6 h-light/18 h-dark cycles combined with different levels of CO2. The cells do not enter S-phase and consequently do not divide after the minimum light period without CO2 supplementation, but do divide after a light period with 1 % CO2. In this way, we can compare a dividing cycle and a non-dividing cycle. We examined changes in the expression of 74 genes throughout the cell cycle by quantitative RTPCR. The expression of genes for two cyclins (cyclin C and H) and two CDKs (CDKA and CDKD) as well as metabolic enzymes was promoted by light, whereas the expression of genes for G1/S or G2/M cyclins and CDKs as well as DNA replication enzymes and proteins related to organellar division was promoted only in the dividing cycles. These results suggested that C. merolae has a checkpoint for G1/S progression, which is regulated by nutrients within the 6 h light period.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据