4.6 Review

N-Linked Glycosylation in Archaea: a Structural, Functional, and Genetic Analysis

期刊

MICROBIOLOGY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REVIEWS
卷 78, 期 2, 页码 304-341

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.00052-13

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. China Scholarship Council
  3. Ontario Graduate Scholarship
  4. Max Planck Society
  5. ERC [311523, Archaellum]
  6. Israel Science Foundation [8/11]
  7. U.S. Army Research Office [W911NF-11-1-520]
  8. Negev-Zin Associates Scholarship
  9. European Research Council (ERC) [311523] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

N-glycosylation of proteins is one of the most prevalent posttranslational modifications in nature. Accordingly, a pathway with shared commonalities is found in all three domains of life. While excellent model systems have been developed for studying N-glycosylation in both Eukarya and Bacteria, an understanding of this process in Archaea was hampered until recently by a lack of effective molecular tools. However, within the last decade, impressive advances in the study of the archaeal version of this important pathway have been made for halophiles, methanogens, and thermoacidophiles, combining glycan structural information obtained by mass spectrometry with bioinformatic, genetic, biochemical, and enzymatic data. These studies reveal both features shared with the eukaryal and bacterial domains and novel archaeon-specific aspects. Unique features of N-glycosylation in Archaea include the presence of unusual dolichol lipid carriers, the use of a variety of linking sugars that connect the glycan to proteins, the presence of novel sugars as glycan constituents, the presence of two very different N-linked glycans attached to the same protein, and the ability to vary the N-glycan composition under different growth conditions. These advances are the focus of this review, with an emphasis on N-glycosylation pathways in Haloferax, Methanococcus, and Sulfolobus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据