4.7 Article

Assessment of bacterial community structure in a long-term copper-polluted ex-vineyard soil

期刊

MICROBIOLOGICAL RESEARCH
卷 163, 期 6, 页码 671-683

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.micres.2006.09.003

关键词

Soil bacteria; Long-term copper pollution; Cu-resistant isolates

资金

  1. Italian Ministry for University and Research (MIUR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of long-term copper contamination on the diversity of bacterial communities was investigated in an ex-vineyard soil. Two sites of the same area but exhibiting different 3-fold exchangeable copper (Ex-Cu) concentrations were analysed. Culturable bacterial community structure was assessed using a variety of approaches: determination of culturable bacteria number, analyses of 132 isolates, and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) patterns of bacterial biomass grown on agar plates and of soil DNA. There was no significant difference in the number of total heterotrophs at the two sites, whereas the percentage of fast-growing bacteria growing in 1 day, was lower at the site with the higher Ex-Cu content. A high percentage of Cu-tolerant bacteria was found in both sites (63-70%) and it was relatively independent of the Cu content. Shifts in species composition of the culturable bacterial community were detected by analysing isolates from the two soils, Gram-positive bacteria prevailed in the less-polluted soil while Gram-negative bacteria in the more-polluted soil. Each sample site had a community with a different metal resistance pattern. Our study seems to indicate that in this soil ecosystem, copper influenced the culturable bacterial communities, affecting the structural diversity and altering some of the metal resistance of the microorganisms. The Sorensen similarity index calculated on DGGE profiles of 16S rDNA of total and culturable bacterial communities indicated a different species composition at the two sites, although both sites had the same biodiversity degree and different dominance. 2006 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据