4.5 Article

Palladium nanoparticles synthesis, characterization using glucosamine as the reductant and stabilizing agent to explore their antibacterial & catalytic applications

期刊

MICROBIAL PATHOGENESIS
卷 125, 期 -, 页码 150-157

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2018.09.020

关键词

Green synthesis; Palladium nanoparticles; Characterization; Antibacterial activity; Catalytic activities

资金

  1. International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Low cost and an easy technique for the synthesis of palladium nanoparticles (PdNPs) was developed. Glucosamine was used to stabilize palladium precursor (PdCl2) into palladium nanoparticles. Several analytical techniques were used for the determination of morphology, crystalline structure; size, capping, and composition of synthesize palladium nanoparticles. The UV-visible spectroscopy SPR peak (Surface Plasmon Resonance) at 284 nm revealed synthesis of PdNPs. Energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) studies proved the elemental composition and crystalline structure of the synthesized palladium nanoparticles respectively. The average particle sizes (5.5 nm) were obtained by using the 1 M glucosamine solution, with a fixed amount of PdCl2(4 mM). Moreover, the as synthesized PdNPs was evaluated against Gram negative bacterial E. which shows tremendous antibacterial activity as compare to tobramycin standard antibiotics. It's mechanistically found that PdNPs damage cell membrane and caused imbalance of metabolism system of the cell as a result production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Thus, these finding revealed that cells become leaky and all organelles come out from cells, finally caused death of the E. coli. Addition, the as prepared PdNPs also showed excellent catalytic activities toward reduction of methylene blue and 4-nitrophenol.Thus, glucosamine mediated PdNPs having dual functions biomedical as well as intoxicating catalyst for industries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据