4.5 Article

Analysis of the 3′-variable region of the cagA gene from Helicobacter pylori strains infecting patients at New York City hospitals

期刊

MICROBIAL PATHOGENESIS
卷 56, 期 -, 页码 29-34

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2012.10.003

关键词

H. pylori; CagA; Peptic ulcer disease; Gastric cancer

资金

  1. PSC-CUNY program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Helicobacter pylori infects the gastric mucosa in humans and is a causative agent for peptic ulcer disease (PUD) and gastric cancer (GC). CagA is produced by H. pylori and is associated with more severe outcomes. cagA genes vary at the 3'-region with respect to phosphorylation motifs (EPIYA-A, -B, -C, or -D) and CagA multimerization motifs (CM). This variability may be associated with the clinical outcomes. We examined the variable region of cagA genes expressed in H. pylori-infected patients treated at three NYC Hospitals. DNA was isolated from gastric biopsies of patients undergoing upper endoscopy. Most H. pylori-infected patients were Black or Hispanic. The cagA 3'-region of CagA-positive samples was amplified by PCR, purified and sequenced. The patterns of EPIYA and CM motifs were examined and related to clinical outcomes. We obtained 42 CagA sequences from our sample collection. The EPIYA phosphorylation motif pattern was ABC in 81.0% of our samples. Western (W) and Eastern (E) CM motifs have also been defined. CagA proteins lacking an Eastern CM motif and possessing one or two Western CM motifs were observed more frequently in patients with PUD and GC when compared with non-ulcer gastritis (50.0% vs 11.8%, respectively), suggesting that these CM motif patterns are more virulent than those containing at least one Eastern CM motif. We conclude that In H. pylori-infected patients treated at NYC Hospitals, CM motif patterns in the CagA 30-variable region may be more significant than EPIYA motif patterns with respect to clinical outcomes. (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据