4.5 Article

The Mycoplasma gallisepticum α-enolase is cell surface-exposed and mediates adherence by binding to chicken plasminogen

期刊

MICROBIAL PATHOGENESIS
卷 51, 期 4, 页码 285-290

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2011.03.012

关键词

Mycoplasma gallisepticum; alpha-Enolase; Plasminogen; Adherence

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30871883, 31001077]
  2. Shanghai Agriculture & Technology Foundation [2007-11-2]
  3. National Non-profit Institute of China [2006JB01, 2008JB12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The alpha-enolase protein is reported to be an adhesin in several pathogenic bacterial species, but its role in Mycoplasma gallisepticum is unknown. In this study, the M. gallisepticum alpha-enolase gene was adapted to heterologous expression in Escherichia coli by performing overlapping polymerase chain reaction with site-directed mutagenesis to introduce A960G and A1158G mutations in the nucleotide sequence. The full-length mutated gene was cloned into a pGEM-T Easy vector and subcloned into the expression vector pET32a(+) to construct the pET-rMGEno plasmid. The expression of rMGEno in E. coli strain DE3 was confirmed by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis with Coomassie blue staining. Purified rMGEno exhibited alpha-enolase catalytic activity that it could reflect the conversion of NADH to NAD(+). Mouse antiserum to alpha-enolase was generated by immunization with rMGEno. Immunoblotting and immunofluorescence assay with the antiserum identified alpha-enolase on the surface of M. gallisepticum cells. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay characterized rMGEno as a chicken plasminogen binding protein. An adherence inhibition assay on immortalized chicken fibroblasts (DF-1) demonstrated more than 77% inhibition of adhesion in the presence of mouse antiserum, suggesting that alpha-enolase of M. gallisepticum participates in bacterial adhesion to DF-1 cells. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据