4.5 Article

The ability of Listeria monocytogenes PI-PLC to facilitate escape from the macrophage phagosome is dependent on host PKC beta

期刊

MICROBIAL PATHOGENESIS
卷 46, 期 1, 页码 1-5

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2008.09.008

关键词

Listeria monocytogenes; PKC beta; PI-PLC; Listeriolysin O; PC-PLC; Knockout

资金

  1. NIH [Al-45153]
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R01AI045153] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Listeria monocytogenes are facultative intracellular pathogenic bacteria that can infect macrophages as well as non-professional phagocytes. After entry in the host cell, the bacteria escape from the phagosome into the cytoplasm. In murine macrophages and in cell lines derived from these cells, escape of L. monocytogenes from the phagosome is absolutely dependent on listeriolysin O (LLO) and facilitated by a secreted phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C (PI-PLC). Work in this laboratory has previously demonstrated a LLO and PI-PLC-dependent translocation of host PKC beta isoforms. Pharmacological inhibition of PKC beta resulted in a significant reduction in permeabilization of the phagosome, and in the number of bacteria reaching the cytosol. These findings led to the prediction that the bacterial PI-PLC promotes escape through the production of diacylglycerol leading to the activation of host PKC beta. To test this hypothesis, bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMMf) obtained from PKC beta knockout (PKC beta KO) or C57BI/6 mice were infected with L monocytogenes. We observed that wild-type L monocytogenes escapes from the phagosome of PKC beta KO BMMf as well as from C57BI/6 BMMF. However, in PKC beta KO BMMf, L. monocytogenes uses a PI-PLC-independent, but phosphatidylcholine-preferring PLC (PC-PLC)-dependent pathway to facilitate escape. These findings strongly support the hypothesis that PI-PLC promotes escape through mobilization of host PKC beta. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据