4.5 Article

Anthrax toxin-induced shock in rats is associated with pulmonary edema and hemorrhage

期刊

MICROBIAL PATHOGENESIS
卷 44, 期 6, 页码 467-472

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2007.12.001

关键词

Anthrax lethal toxin; Anthrax edema toxins; Heart failure; Vascular injury

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacillus anthracis infections are frequently associated with severe and often irreversible hypotensive shock despite appropriate antibiotics and aggressive hemodynamic and pulmonary support. Based on the observations that the anthrax secreted proteins-protective antigen (PA). lethal factor (LF), and edema factor (EF) also produce shock and mortality in animal models. we chose to characterize further the clinical chemistries and microscopic pathology of toxin treated rats. Groups of three male Sprague Dawley rats received bolus intravenous infusions of PA/LF. PA/EF. LF. or EF alone and blood samples and tissues were collected and assayed for chemistries and tissue pathology. In PA/LF and PA/EF treated animals but not other groups, chemistries showed transaminasemia and elevated lactate dehydrogenase. PA/LF treated animals alone showed elevated hemoglobin and hematocrits: PA/EF treated animals alone showed lymphopenia. Pathology was remarkable for pulmonary edema in PA/LF treated rat lungs,S and pulmonary hemorrhage in PA/EF treated rat lungs. These results are consistent With our and Others' previous findings that the morbidity and mortality associated with anthrax are not cytokine-mediated but due to a direct effect of the toxins on the cardiovascular system along with toxin-specific alterations in blood counts. PA/LF pathology matches that seen With acute cardiac failure, and PA/EF pathology coincides with direct vascular endothelial injury. These observations provide a rational basis for drug interventions 10 reduce the effect of these toxins on the heart and blood vessels. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据