4.7 Article

Abundance and Diversity of Biofilms in Natural and Artificial Aquifers of the Aspo Hard Rock Laboratory, Sweden

期刊

MICROBIAL ECOLOGY
卷 61, 期 2, 页码 410-422

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00248-010-9761-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co.
  2. Swedish Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Six cores were drilled and retrieved from 186-m depth in the Aspo Hard Rock Laboratory (HRL) tunnel to investigate whether indigenous biofilms develop on fracture surfaces in groundwater-conducting aquifers in granitic rock. A clone library was constructed from fracture surface material (FSM), for community composition analysis. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was applied to quantify gene copies using the 16S rRNA gene for domain Bacteria and the adenosine-phosphosulfate reductase gene (apsA) for sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB). Results were compared with three groundwater systems with biofilms in laminar flow reactors (LFRs) at 450-m depth in the Aspo HRL. The total number of cells, counted microscopically, was approximately 2 Au 10(5) cells cm(-2) in the LFR systems, consistent with the obtained qPCR 16S rRNA gene copies. qPCR analysis reported similar to 1 Au 10(2) up to similar to 1 Au 10(4) gene copies cm(-2) on the FSM from the drill cores. In the FSM biofilms, 33% of the sequenced clones were related to the iron-reducing bacterium Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, while in the LFR biofilms, 41% of the sequenced clones were affiliated with the genera Desulfovibrio, Desulforhopalus, Desulfomicrobium, and Desulfobulbus. The community composition of the FSM biofilms differed from the drill water community, excluding drill water contamination. This work reports significant numbers of microorganisms on natural hard rock aquifer fracture surfaces with site-specific community compositions. The probability that biofilms are generally present in groundwater-conducting aquifers in deep granitic rock is consequently great.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据