4.2 Article

Characterization of Aminoglycoside-Modifying Enzymes in Enterobacteriaceae Clinical Strains and Characterization of the Plasmids Implicated in Their Diffusion

期刊

MICROBIAL DRUG RESISTANCE
卷 19, 期 2, 页码 94-99

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/mdr.2012.0125

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Health and Consumer Affairs
  2. Instituto de Salud Carlos III-FEDER
  3. Spanish Network for the Research in Infectious Diseases [REIPI RD06/0008]
  4. Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria [PS05/1751]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A total of 788 clinical Enterobacteriaceae were collected to describe the aminoglycoside-modifying genes (AME genes) and to characterize the plasmids that carry these genes. Among the 788 strains collected, 330 (41.8%) were aminoglycoside-resistant: 264 Escherichia coli (80%), 33 Proteus mirabilis (10%), 10 Klebsiella pneumoniae (3%), six K. oxytoca (1.8%), five Enterobacter cloacae (1.5%), three Morganella morganii (0.9%), three Providencia stuartii (0.9%), two Salmonella enterica (0.6%), and one each Citrobacter freundii, C. koseri, Proteus vulgaris, and Shigella sonnei. The most affected aminoglycoside was streptomycin (92.7%), followed by kanamycin (26.3%), gentamicin (18%), tobramycin (16.9%), netilmicin (3.6%), and amikacin (1.5%). The AME genes found were aph(3 '')-Ib (65.4%), ant(3 '')-Ia (37.5%), aph(3')-Ia (13.9%), aac(3)-IIa (12.4%), aac(6')-Ib (4.2%), ant(2 '')-Ia (3.6%), and aph(3')-IIa (1.2%). Thirty-four percent of the strains showed more than one enzyme. The most frequent association was ant(3 '')-Ia plus aph(3 '')-Ib (35 strains). From 66 selected AME genes, 24 were plasmid located: 12 aac(3)-IIa, six aph(3 '')-Ia, three ant(3 '')-Ia, two ant(2 '')-Ia, and one aac(6')-Ib. These genes were located in plasmids belonging to incompatibility groups F, FIA, FIB, or HI2. In conclusion, the AME genes involved in aminoglycoside-clinical resistance were aac(3)-IIa, aac(6')-Ib, and ant(2 '')-Ia, genes that confer resistance to tobramycin, gentamicin, and amikacin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据