4.6 Article

Topical flagellin protects the injured corneas from Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection

期刊

MICROBES AND INFECTION
卷 12, 期 12-13, 页码 978-989

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.micinf.2010.06.007

关键词

Innate immunity; Toll like receptors (TLRs); Flagellin; Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs); Cathelicidin; Keratitis

资金

  1. NIH [EY017960, EY010869]
  2. Research to Prevent Blindness to the Department of Ophthalmology, Wayne State University School of Medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Among bacterial pathogens Pseudomonas (P) aeruginosa infection is the most sight threatening The corneal innate immune responses are key mediators of the host s defense to P aeruginosa Using a mouse model of Pseudomonas keratitis we evaluated the protective effects of topical application of flagellin a ligand for Toll Like receptor 5 (TLR5) on the development of Pseudomonas keratitis and elucidated the underlying mechanisms Topical application of purified flagellin 6 and 24 h prior to P aeruginosa inoculation on injured mouse corneas significantly attenuated clinical symptoms of P aeruginosa keratitis decreased bacterial burden and suppressed infection induced inflammation in the B6 mouse cornea Topical application of flagellin on wounded cornea induced PMN Infiltration and markedly upregulated cathelicidin-related antimicrobial peptide (CRAMP) expression In PMN depleted mice flagellin promoted bacterial clearance in the cornea compared to that of the PBS treated mice but was unable to prevent corneal perforation and systemic bacterial dissemination and sepses Deletion of CRAMP increased corneal susceptibility to P aeruginosa and abolished flagellin induced protection in B6 mice Our findings illustrate the profound protective effect of flagellin on the cornea innate defense a response that can be exploited for prophylactic purposes to prevent contact lens associated Pseudomonas keratitis (C) 2010 Institut Pasteur Published by Elsevier Masson SAS All rights reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据