4.6 Article

Role of CCL3/MIP-1α and CCL5/RANTES during acute Trypanosoma cruzi infection in rats

期刊

MICROBES AND INFECTION
卷 12, 期 8-9, 页码 669-676

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.micinf.2010.04.011

关键词

Chemokines; CCR5; Trypanosoma cruzi; Myocarditis

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa (CNPq, Brazil)
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG, Brazil)
  3. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES, Brazil)
  4. NIH/FIRCA, USA [1 R03-TW006857-01A1]
  5. NIH, USA [AI-076248]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chagas' disease is caused by Trypanosoma cruzi infection and is characterized by chronic fibrogenic inflammation and heart dysfunction. Chemokines are produced during infection and drive tissue inflammation. In rats, acute infection is characterized by intense myocarditis and regression of inflammation after control of parasitism. We investigated the role of CCL3 and CCL5 during infection by using DNA vaccination encoding for each chemokine separately or simultaneously. MetRANTES treatment was used to evaluate the role of CCR1 and CCR5, the receptors for CCL3 and CCL5. Vaccination with CCL3 or CCL5 increased heart parasitism and decreased local IFN-gamma production, but did not influence intensity of inflammation. Simultaneous treatment with both plasmids or treatment with MetRANTES enhanced cardiac inflammation, fibrosis and parasitism. In conclusion, chemokines CCL3 and CCL5 are relevant, but not essential, for control of T cruzi infection in rats. On the other hand, combined blockade of these chemokines or their receptors enhanced tissue inflammation and fibrosis, clearly contrasting with available data in murine models of T cruzi infection. These data reinforce the important role of chemolcines during T cruzi infection but suggest that caution must be taken when expanding the therapeutic modulation of the chemokine system in mice to the human infection. (c) 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据