4.6 Article

Novel recombinant RD2-and RD11-encoded Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigens are potential candidates for diagnosis of tuberculosis infections in BCG-vaccinated individuals

期刊

MICROBES AND INFECTION
卷 11, 期 10-11, 页码 876-885

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.micinf.2009.05.008

关键词

Mycobacterium tuberculosis; RD2-encoded antigens; RD11-encoded antigens; Immunodiagnosis; ELISPOT; Latent TB infection

资金

  1. National 11th five-year Key Technologies Research and Development Program of China [2008ZX10003003, 2008ZX10003011]
  2. Major State Basic Research Program of China [2005CB523102]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Proteins encoded by region of deletions (RD) of Mycobacterium tuberculosis are useful in development of vaccines and diagnostic reagents. In the present study, six M. tuberculosis genes from RD2 and RD11, rv1978, nrdf1, mpt64, cfp-21, ppe57 and ppe59, were cloned and over-expressed in Escherichia coli. All six purified recombinant proteins could distinguish tuberculosis (TB) patients and latent TB infected subjects (LTBI), or called subclinical TB infection, from BCG-vaccinated healthy controls by T-cell IFN-gamma releasing ELISPOT. ELISPOT of Rv1978, NrdF1, Mpt64, CFP-21, Ppe57 and Ppe59 achieved sensitivities of 59%, 60%, 82%, 48%, 59% and 47% respectively in the detection of active TB and specificities of 94%, 90%, 76%, 93%, 100% and 93% respectively in BCG-vaccinated healthy controls. Combination of Ppe57 or NrdF1 with early secreted antigen target 6 (ESAT-6) or 10-kDa culture filtrate protein (CFP-10) in the IFN-gamma releasing ESLIPOT assay could increase the sensitivities in detecting active TB, for ESAT-6 from 82.1% to 85.7% or 92.9% (P = 0.5 or 0.03, respectively) and for CFP-10 from 67.9% to 78.6% or 83.9%, respectively (both P < 0.05). The high sensitivities, specificities and promising antigenic combination of NrdF1 and Ppe57 in detection of TB in BCG-vaccinated controls suggest their potential application in TB diagnosis. (C) 2009 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据